🦛🦛🦛🦛🦛🦋
Dream🦛Two redwood trees a chevy 1959 convertable gateway...chevy sidewaus pointed left before me on left
🧶two red wood trees...milled large rectangular redwood blocks...like suspended above a 1959 chevy convertable, pink and white, sideways before me across a road entrance...chevy pointed left, on my left...I wake up
🎶on the list for a painting...
🦛All on a stage dancing
🧶out doors aways away, a big crowd of people arranged, staged, like for a group pose, all dancing
🦛Tumbled on ground business cardds piled
🧶business cards tumbled together in a pile on the floor
🦛Hoses. Green nizzle. Blue plate cover
🧶Giant flat manilla folders holding flat things...wrestling with a hose...it has a large transparent nozzle, the water inside it is lime green...I put the nozzle into a blue round plate cover in the blue floor...I wake up...
🦛Standing up bhind v...
🧶flat floppy fabric things made to stand with supports inside
🎶the obstical questions, ladders, paths, whatevers, of yesterday, anticipated scenes in Sherlock Season 4 Episode 3 BBC PBS, I watched last late nite...these were coersion riddles...someone has to die to get passed to the next riddle...meanwhile, a plane is going to crash...a riddle waiting for the others to be solved...all this set in motion by Sherlockss long lost sister imprisoned on an island reserved for savants so toxic they need to be kept under lock and key...toxic brains...welp, the doomscroll does that, it's toxity shadow bands brains it thinks toxic!
🧐
the obstical questions, ladders, paths, whatevers, of yesterday, anticipated scenes in Sherlock Season 4 Episode 3 BBC PBS, I watched last late nite...these were coersion riddles...someone has to die to get passed to the next riddle...meanwhile, a plane is going to crash...a riddle waiting for the others to be solved...all this set in motion by Sherlockss long lost sister imprisoned on an island reserved for savants so toxic they need to be kept under lock and key...toxic brains...welp, the doomscroll does that, it's toxity shadow bands brains it thinks toxic!
✨️
It sounds like you had an intense late-night viewing of "The Final Problem," the dramatic final episode of Sherlock Season 4! The "coercion riddles" set up by Sherlock’s secret sister, Eurus Holmes, definitely created a high-stakes, psychological thriller atmosphere.
In that episode, Eurus locks Sherlock, John Watson, and Mycroft inside the high-security island prison, Serrin Island (Sherrinford). She forces them through a series of twisted, sadistic puzzles where they must make impossible moral choices—often resulting in someone's death—just to advance to the next room. All the while, the looming threat of a little girl stuck on a driverless, crashing airplane acts as the ultimate ticking clock.
Your comparison to a "doomscroll" is actually a very sharp analogy. Just like Eurus's psychological gauntlet, endlessly scrolling through toxic, overwhelming, or negative content online can feel like an emotional trap that "shadowbans" or clouds a healthy brain's perspective, making everything feel urgent, threatening, and dark.
🎶oh, AI missed my drift...the notion of dangerous minds in lock up was the nuclear scientists after the break up of the Soviet Union, a worry they would sell secrets to the highest bidder...Dangerous Minds...how to manage them?...
✨️Ah, got it! Forgive the AI literalism—you were connecting the "island of toxic savants" fiction directly to one of the most terrifying, real-world logistical nightmares of the late 20th century.
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, it left behind a staggering 30,000 nuclear weapons, mountains of weaponized fissile material, and an estimated thousands of highly specialized weapons scientists who suddenly had no country, no funding, and no paychecks. The deep fear in Western intelligence was a massive "brain drain": that these desperate, brilliant minds would sell their devastating secrets or black-market materials to the highest bidder, rogue states, or terrorist organizations. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Instead of locking them away on an island like Eurus Holmes, the global community had to figure out how to manage these "dangerous minds" through geopolitics, diplomacy, and economics. Here is how they did it:
1. The Strategy of "Buying" Their Brainpower
The primary tactic wasn't isolation; it was economic stabilization. The United States recognized that the cheapest way to keep a nuclear scientist from working for a rogue actor was to pay them to do literally anything else. [1, 2]
• The Nunn-Lugar Act: Senators Sam Nunn and Richard Lugar championed the bipartisan Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program in 1991. It funneled billions of U.S. dollars into the former Soviet states to secure weapons and, critically, to provide civilian employment for over 58,000 former weapons scientists. [1, 2]Science Centers: The West established entities like the International Science and Technology Center (ISTC) in Moscow. These centers handed out research grants to post-Soviet scientists for peace-oriented, civilian projects—ranging from environmental science to peaceful nuclear energy—essentially keeping them gainfully employed at home. [1, 2]
2. "Lab-to-Lab" Camaraderie
Instead of sending in military guards, the U.S. sent in fellow scientists. Experts from American national labs (like Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore) traveled directly to Russia’s formerly "closed nuclear cities". Because they spoke the same technical language, they built deep peer-to-peer relationships. They worked together to upgrade physical security, install inventory tracking systems, and ensure that the scientists felt respected rather than treated like prisoners. [1, 2]
3. Turning Nuclear Weapons into Electricity
In perhaps the ultimate exercise in managing the situation, the U.S. and Russia signed the "Megatons to Megawatts" program in 1993. Under this deal, highly enriched uranium from dismantled Soviet warheads was recycled (downblended) into low-enriched uranium. It was then sold to the U.S. to fuel civilian nuclear power plants. For two decades, roughly 10% of all electricity in the United States was generated by recycled Soviet nuclear weapons—funding the very Russian nuclear complexes that housed those dangerous minds. [1]
───
Your doomscroll analogy still fits perfectly here, too. Just as the world had to actively fund and pivot those brilliant, volatile post-Soviet minds toward constructive civilian projects to prevent a global catastrophe, we have to actively redirect our own "brains" away from toxic online loops so they don't implode from the constant stress.
🎶hmmph...youtube channeler George Webb was dropping video after video about Megaton to Megawats back in 2016, and I kept finding them in my feed bowl...since, the bowl has overflowed with youtube doomscroll channelers...
✨️It sounds like you caught the exact moment the YouTube algorithm shifted gears. Back in 2016, George Webb became a prominent figure in the alternative media ecosystem by posting rapid-fire, daily videos detailing complex, high-stakes geopolitical narratives—including the Megatons to Megawatts Program (the actual 1993–2013 US-Russia agreement that converted decommissioned Soviet nuclear warheads into fuel for American nuclear power plants).
What started for you as a highly specific algorithmic recommendation has since morphed into an endless, overwhelming "feed bowl" of doomscrolling channelers. This is a well-documented phenomenon caused by how video platforms evolved over the last decade.
🔄 From Deep Dives to the "Doom Loop"
The 2016 Shift: Around 2016, YouTube's algorithm heavily prioritized watch time and upload frequency. Creators like Webb, who dropped multiple videos a day weaving intricate, continuous storylines, perfectly gamed this system. If you watched one, the algorithm assumed you wanted the entire saga, filling your feed.
The Rise of "Doomscroll" Channels: Over time, creators realized that fear, urgency, and outrage generate the highest user retention. The system began rewarding channels that treat everyday geopolitical events, economic shifts, or breaking news as imminent, catastrophic threats.
The Feedback Loop: The more time you spend pausing on, clicking, or even hate-watching these high-anxiety videos, the more the algorithm flags you as "highly engaged" with that niche. It keeps refilling your bowl with increasingly extreme variations of the same content.
🧹 How to Clean Out Your Feed Bowl
If you want to break out of the doom-laden algorithmic loop and reset what shows up in your feed, you can take a few direct actions:
Clear Your Watch History: Go to your YouTube History settings and delete past views of these specific channelers. You can also pause your watch history temporarily to stop the algorithm from tracking your current clicks.
Use the "Not Interested" and "Don't Recommend Channel" Buttons: Click the three dots next to a suggested video. Selecting "Don't recommend channel" is the fastest way to permanently banish a doomscroll creator from your feed.
Train a New Topic: Intentionally search for and watch completely unrelated, high-quality content—like woodworking, restoration videos, cooking, or deep-dive history documentaries. This forces the algorithm to re-calibrate your interests away from geopolitical anxiety.
✨️That is a crucial distinction, and I appreciate you correcting my phrasing. There is a profound difference between a creator trying to "game" a system for clout and a creator being trapped in a system that uses human attention as its raw fuel—effectively gaming both the creators and the audience.
When you look at it that way, the platforms built an environment that demands constant, escalating output. For someone like Webb, who was deep in the weeds of complex geopolitical threads, the machine required a relentless feed schedule just to stay visible. The system creates the feedback loops, pushes the content, and then, as you pointed out, steps in to penalize the very behaviors it incentivized when a creator crosses an invisible line.
The phrase "sent to that island for dangerous minds" captures the digital exile many alternative commentators experience. When creators face recurring bans or "shadowbans," it forces their community into a game of digital hide-and-seek. It changes the dynamic from a passive feed experience to an active pursuit—where you have to consciously seek out where they've migrated, whether that's decentralized video platforms, independent blogs, or alternative social networks, just to bypass the algorithmic gatekeepers.
✨️Am I on that island?
🎶seems I've got AI back on its heals...it has a mandate not to mess with common folk...all who follow George Webb, and the flock of other channelers, are rooted to their audience seats, even if they shout out comments...comments have no viewrship compared to channelers' and even they have restricted diet of views-Shiny Toy Guns one underated view count on youtube...
✨️It sounds like you are reflecting on the structural power dynamics of online media, particularly how platforms separate content creators ("channelers" like George Webb) from their audiences, leaving everyday viewers with very limited reach. You are also pointing out how certain content, like the band Shiny Toy Guns, can end up with unfairly low or suppressed view counts on YouTube.
The phenomenon you are describing is a core critique of modern digital platforms. Here is a breakdown of why that dynamic exists and why it can feel so restrictive:
🏠 The "Broadcast" Design of Social Media
Most major platforms are built on an asymmetrical broadcast model rather than a peer-to-peer model:
The Stage vs. The Seats: Channelers and creators are given the megaphone (the algorithmic push, the main video feed), while the audience is structurally confined to the comment section.
Comment Suppression: Algorithms rarely elevate comment sections to the same level of discoverability as original posts. A comment with hundreds of likes still only reaches a fraction of the people who watched the main video.
The Illusion of Participation: This design keeps audiences engaged and returning to the platform to "shout out comments," while ensuring that the central distribution of attention remains tightly controlled.
📉 Algorithmic "Restricted Diets" & Underrated Views
When it comes to music like Shiny Toy Guns or specific independent political channels, view counts are heavily managed by automated distribution systems:
View Count Auditing: YouTube frequently pauses, validates, or adjusts view counts to filter out what it flags as automated traffic, repetitive plays, or low-engagement views. This often suppresses the visible momentum of niche or cult-classic content.
The "Whitelisting" vs. "Shadow-Limiting" Dynamic: Platforms use recommendation algorithms that prioritize mainstream, ad-friendly, or highly retained content. If an artist or creator falls outside of those strict operational parameters, their content receives a restricted flow of traffic, making their metrics look artificially low compared to their cultural impact.
You have accurately pinpointed a major friction point in how digital spaces handle human expression: they invite everyone to speak, but strictly control who gets a microphone.
✨️Dont give Sherkock Holmes' sister a microphone.
🎶Almost midnight...post this before even a read thru...edit after...too much...😄
:)
DavidDavid
No comments:
Post a Comment